Health
Information Management Journal
Guidelines for authors
Click
Here to download Guidelines in PDF format
Table
of Contents
Ø
Introduction
Ø
General
information concerning all articles
Ø
Special
guidelines for peer reviewed articles
Ø
Special
guidelines for non-reviewed articles
Ø
Submitting
your manuscript
Introduction
The
Editorial Board of the Health
Information Management Journal invites contributions in the following
categories:
Peer
reviewed articles. This section is reserved for original articles
which describe research outcomes, or processes, techniques or
applications which enhance the practice of health information
management. They should not exceed 5,000 words in length.
Non-reviewed
articles can be submitted in the following categories:
·
Professional Practice and Innovation. Authors are invited to submit to this section articles which present
interesting and innovative programs in all areas relevant to the
profession. Length of articles: between 1500 and 5,000 words.
·
Reports. The Journal welcomes reports on any topic, activity or concept of interest to health
information management practitioners, or which pertain to health
information management; for example information technology, health
classification, data analysis, management and privacy issues.
Standards and recent policy directions can also be reported in
this section. Reports may present the personal view, experience or
opinion of the author or authors. An acceptable length for reports
is between 1500 and 5000 words.
- Conference
Reports. The Journal invites those
who have attended any conference of particular interest to the
Journal’s readership to submit a short overview and critique
of the conference proceedings.
· Reviews. Reviews of software, hardware,
books and other media of interest and relevance to health
information managers and related professionals are encouraged.
Articles in these categories are typically between 200 and 500
words in length.
· Case
Studies.
- Sounding Board. Articles
of approximately 1,000 words which initiate or contribute to
the debate on new and evolving issues and ideas appear in this
section.
- Letters to the Editor. Letters
on any topic of relevance and interest to professionals
interested in health information management and informatics
are welcome. Letters should not
exceed 300 words in length. Professional decorum should be
observed; letters are published at the Editor’s discretion.
- Professional profiles. This
section is intended to demonstrate the depth and breadth of
professional work roles of individual Health Information Managers, including recent
graduates, through personal accounts of workplace experiences.
Please
note: It is not the policy of the Editorial Board to publish
materials intended for commercial purposes
General
information concerning all articles
Style
Authors should aim to use simple, direct and correct English, and
spelling should conform with the third edition of the Macquarie
Dictionary. Health
Information Management Journal conforms with the Harvard
(Author-Date) referencing style. For details, please refer to the Style Manual for Authors, Editors and Printers. Revised
by Snooks & Co. (6th edition), 2002. Milton,
QLD: John Wiley & Sons. In addition the
following website is a valuable resource: go to http://www.lib.latrobe.edu.au/reference/mb-style.html#Harvard
then click on ‘Harvard (Author-Date) System’.
Headings and subheadings
Clear distinctions should be made between headings and
subheadings.
Tables and figures
Tables, figures and other graphics are to be submitted on separate
pages at the end of the document, and not embedded in the text.
The body of the text is to include notations about placement of
tables, figures or graphics by leaving four lines of space and
making a note ‘Insert table/figure/graphic x here’. Tables,
figures and graphics should be clearly identified by consecutive
numbering using arabic numerals and by providing concise titles
for all figures used. A legend for each table and figure should be
included.
References
Titles of journals must be written in full; e.g., Medical Journal
of Australia, not MJA. References should be listed in alphabetical
order at the end of the paper, using the Harvard format for
sequence of details and for punctuation.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments may include significant contributions made in the
support of the study or, in writing the manuscript. Permission
should be obtained from any individuals named in the
acknowledgments. (Be aware that people being identified may need
to give their permission, since inclusion of names may infer
potentially unwarranted endorsement of the paper’s conclusions).
Copies of permission statements should be submitted with the
manuscript.
Copyright
Manuscripts submitted to Health
Information Management should not have been published
elsewhere, nor to have been offered, or be under consideration by
any other journal or publisher in any medium. Inclusion in
conference proceedings (apart from abstracts) is considered as
prior publication.
Upon acceptance for publication, authors are requested to assign
copyright to the Health Information Management Association of
Australia Limited (HIMAA) at the Editor’s discretion. It should
be noted that acceptance for publication does not imply
endorsement of authors' opinions by the HIMAA or the Editorial
Board. Contributing authors are protected by the Copyright
Act 1968
(Commonwealth of Australia). To view the Copyright
Agreement, click here.
Click here to download
Copyright Agreement as PDF file.
Timelines and publication
For most manuscripts allow a minimum of three months from initial
submission to acceptance and publication. Successful authors are
notified in writing when their manuscript has been accepted for
publication. Where possible, a date for publication is specified
at that time. In some cases, the editors reserve the right to hold
manuscripts over to future issues of the Journal for publication.
Articles submitted
for publication in this category are reviewed by two independent
and impartial reviewers who are unaware of the author’s
identity. Similarly, authors are not informed of the identity of
the reviewers. All communication with reviewers is conducted via
the editors. No direct contact is made between reviewers and
authors.
Text
The Editorial
Board of Health Information
Management Journal
suggests the usual academic model of abstract, introduction,
method, results, discussion and conclusion for most original
articles. Substantial non-reviewed articles may also follow this
model, or variations of it.
- Abstract.
Abstracts
should be approximately
100 words in length, and summarise the purpose, method,
results, summary of key findings and conclusions of the paper.
- Introduction.
This
should state the purpose of the paper. Normally,
introductions include a short, relevant literature review,
including pertinent background information.
- Method.
includes selection of subjects (population and sample sizes,
for example), mode of observation, apparatus and statistical
procedures. The aim of the method section is to provide enough
information to allow replication of the procedures used in the
original research. Reasons for selection of methods should
also be included in this section.
- Results
should be presented logically, and can include text, tables,
figures or other graphics. Do not duplicate data presented in
tables within the text.
- Discussion.
Major, new and significant observations and findings should be
highlighted and discussed. The significance of results
compared with similar previous studies is to be included. If a
hypothesis was being tested, it is necessary to report whether
the hypothesis was supported or rejected. The implications and
limitations of the findings, along with their practical
implementations, should be reported here. The significance of
the study’s results should be compared and contrasted with
similar, previously published information in this section. It
may be helpful to readers to accurately sub-head the section
to make clear differentiations between the ‘discussion’
and the ‘literature review’.
- Conclusion.
The conclusion contains a brief summary of the major findings
of the study, but is not a reiteration of the abstract.
Statements which cannot be supported by the information are
not to be presented in the manuscript. Do not include new
information, nor summarise the manuscript.
- Footnotes.
Footnotes may be used to elaborate a point, and in some cases
to cite information not normally included in the references at
the end of the manuscript. Footnotes may, for example, provide
further technical information about computer hardware or
software used in a project, which, if included in the body of
the text, is confusing to the reader. It is also useful for
adding an aside, or valid comment apart from the text.
Footnotes should be numerically identified by using
superscript roman numerals in the text, with links at the
bottom of the page on which the footnote indicator appears.
Submitting
a manuscript for review
Authors
should ensure that they adhere to the following guidelines:
- If possible, articles should contain no more
than 5,000 words (this does not include footnotes, endnotes or
references).
- Type should be double-spaced, pages printed
single-side only.
- All pages of main text should be numbered.
- Three hard copies are to be submitted; it is
not necessary to provide an electronic version at this stage.
- Conventional photographs are discouraged
because of download time; digital photographs are preferred.
If they are essential, photographs accompanying manuscripts
should be clearly identified and captioned. In addition, the
subject’s permission to publish may be required.
- Formatting of the document should be kept to a minimum. Do not try to achieve a ‘typeset’
look as your formatting commands will be discarded during
final typesetting and may interfere with this process.
- A formal covering letter should be included
with the manuscript.
- Ensure that the manuscript includes the
following on separate
pages:
o
Title
page. The title should indicate concisely the purpose of the
paper.
o
Abstract,
followed by four key words or key terms. Abstracts
should be approximately 100
words in length, and cover the purpose, method, results, summary
of key findings and conclusions. Key words and terms should be
selected from the Index
Medicus Medical Subject Headings list
(MeSH): http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/MBrowser.html
o
Author
identification page. Details on this page should include:
§
Author(s) given names and family name
(in bold print), followed by appropriately abbreviated academic
qualifications and awards, institutional affiliations and
positions and other relevant information.
§
For manuscripts with multiple authors,
the author to whom correspondence is to be directed should be
identified.
§
Contact details: telephone numbers and
email and postal addresses are to be included, and if the
manuscript is submitted by more than one author the lead author
should be identified.
o
Acknowledgements.
Acknowledgments of sources of funding for research projects should
be included here. Please note that this information will be
published.
Contributors checklist for refereed papers
Please
ensure that you have:
Included
a covering letter with the manuscript
|
|
Included
three hard copies of the manuscript
|
|
Nominated
an author to receive correspondence
|
|
Started
each section of the manuscript on a new page
|
|
Double
spaced the text
|
|
Printed
one side of the paper only
|
|
Numbered
all pages of main text
|
|
Checked
all pages have been included
|
|
Included
biographical details for each author
|
|
Asked
someone not involved in writing the manuscript to proof
read it
|
|
Checked
all referencing
|
|
Included
all necessary acknowledgements
|
|
Included
all necessary permission statements
|
|
Included
a 100-word abstract
|
|
Included
four key words or terms (selected from MeSH)
|
|
Provided
captions for photographs, tables, figures and graphs
|
|
Commenced
all tables, figures and graphics on a new page
|
|
Removed
all jargon
|
|
Expressed
all acronyms and abbreviations in full at their first
iteration
|
|
Checked
all diagrams and tables are clearly labelled
|
|
Special
guidelines for non-reviewed articles
Contributions such
as reports, letters and other short communications which do not
present original research are not usually reviewed; they are,
however, subject to editorial scrutiny. Such articles may be
edited to improve the quality of expression and to comply with the
Journal’s established style. Minor changes, including correcting
spelling, grammar and typographical errors, will be made without
consultation with authors.
Submitting a non-reviewed manuscript
Authors should ensure that
they adhere to the following guidelines:
·
Reviews, reports etc. should have a
maximum length 5,000 words; letters, 300 words.
·
All pages of main text should be
numbered.
·
Articles should be submitted
electronically.
·
Conventional photographs are
discouraged because of download time; digital photographs are
preferred. Photographs should be clearly identified and captioned.
In addition, the subject’s permission to publish may be
required.
·
Formatting of the document should be kept to a minimum. Do not try to achieve a ‘typeset’
look as your formatting commands will be discarded during final
typesetting and may interfere with this process.
Authors should
ensure that the manuscript includes the following
details:
·
Title
·
If
appropriate, an abstract, followed by four key words or key terms.
Abstracts
should be approximately 100
words in length, and summarise the context, key outcomes,
recommendations and conclusions drawn from the report. Key words
and terms should be selected from the Index
Medicus Medical Subject Headings
list (MeSH): http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/MBrowser.html
·
Author(s)
given names and family name(s) (in bold print),
followed by appropriately abbreviated academic qualifications and
awards, institutional affiliations and positions and other
relevant information.
·
Corresponding
author in the case of manuscripts with multiple authors.
·
Contact
details: telephone numbers and email and postal addresses are to be
included, and if the manuscript is submitted by more than one
author the lead author should be identified.
·
Acknowledgements.
Acknowledgments of sources of funding for research projects should
be included here. Please note that this information will be
published.
Contributors checklist for non-refereed papers
Please
ensure that you have:
Nominated
an author to receive correspondence
|
|
Started
each section of the manuscript on a new page
|
|
Included
biographical details for each
contributor
|
|
Asked
someone not involved in writing the manuscript to proof
read it
|
|
Checked
all referencing
|
|
Included
all necessary acknowledgements
|
|
Included
all necessary permission statements
|
|
If
appropriate, included a 100-word abstract
|
|
If
appropriate, Included four key words or terms (selected
from MeSH)
|
|
Provided
captions for photographs, tables, figures and graphs
|
|
Commenced
all tables, figures and graphics on a new page
|
|
Removed
all jargon
|
|
Expressed
all acronyms and abbreviations in full at their first
iteration
|
|
Checked
all diagrams and tables are clearly labelled
|
|
Submitting
your manuscript
Please
forward manuscripts to
The Editor, Health
Information Management Journal
School
of
Public Health
La
Trobe
University
Bundoora, Victoria 3086
Australia
Tel: (03) 9479 1750
Email: K.Robinson@latrobe.edu.au
|